Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-11-22 dismissed

NITIN MAHADEO JAWALE & ORS vs BHASKAR MAHADEO MUTKE

Bench: 2 — J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed a petition by defendants seeking to uphold a Trial Court order that had permitted filing a written statement over 4½ years late. The High Court had earlier set aside this condonation order. The Court held that while lawyer negligence may occur, it alone cannot justify condoning extended delays. Litigants bear an independent duty to vigilantly monitor their own cases and cannot simply blame their advocates to obtain relief. The judgment emphasizes that litigants cannot disown their advocates opportunistically to seek judicial favours.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Limitation and Delay Advocate Accountability Litigant's Duty Condonation of Delay

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login