Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-07 allowed

Nitya Dharmananda @ K. Lenin & Anr vs Gopal Sheelum Reddy also known as Nithya Bhaktananda and Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court clarified the scope of Section 91 CrPC (power to summon documents) at the charge-framing stage in a rape case. While an accused cannot ordinarily invoke Section 91 to obtain investigative material not in the charge sheet, the court retains discretion to summon withheld material of sterling quality if satisfied it has crucial bearing on the charge-framing issue. This discretionary power serves justice and prevents investigator manipulation, but does not grant the defence an independent right to invoke Section 91 without court satisfaction. The High Court's automatic grant of the application was reversed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Section 91 CrPC Rape Charge Framing Evidence Collection Investigator's Duty Prosecutorial Discretion

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login