Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-11-05 dismissed

Noida Special Economic Zone Authority vs Manish Agarwal & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

NOIDA Special Economic Zone Authority sought full payment of its admitted claim of INR 6.29 Crores against Shree Bhoomika International Limited (a defaulting sub-lessee of SEZ land). The NCLT and NCLAT approved a Resolution Plan allocating only INR 50 Lakhs to the Appellant. The Supreme Court held that: (1) valuation is a factual matter not reviewable if supported by evidence; (2) the Committee of Creditors' financial decisions are matters of commercial wisdom and non-justiciable; (3) IBC 2016 overrides conflicting provisions of the SEZ Act; and (4) once a Resolution Plan is approved and implemented, courts should not re-examine it absent statutory violation. The appeal was dismissed as the Appellant had already received and accepted its allocated amount.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Resolution Plans Committee of Creditors Operational Creditors Valuation of Corporate Debtors Statutory Dues SEZ Regulations Commercial Wisdom of CoC

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login