Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-02-11 allowed

(NOW DECEASED) & ORS vs SATISH CHANDRA (NOW DECEASED

Bench: 2 — Dipankar Datta, Prashant Kumar Mishra

In Brief

Two long-pending suits for specific performance of property sales were filed in 1972-73. During the pendency of second appeals before the High Court, the original defendants died without substitution of their heirs. Years later, the heirs filed applications seeking substitution and condonation of delay. The High Court dismissed these applications, requiring a separate application to set aside abatement. The Supreme Court held that an application for substitution of legal heirs inherently encompasses the prayer for setting aside abatement, even if not explicitly stated. The Court emphasized a justice-oriented approach and set aside the High Court's orders, restoring the second appeals for merit-based hearing, directing expedited disposal within six months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Code of Civil Procedure Order XXII Abatement of Appeals Substitution of Parties Legal Heirs Condonation of Delay Limitation Law Specific Performance Justice and Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login