Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-07-18 allowed

P. YUVAPRAKASH vs STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Bench: 2 — S. Ravindra Bhat, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

A man was convicted of sexually assaulting a minor after he and his relatives allegedly kidnapped her, married her at a temple, and had sexual intercourse with her. The High Court confirmed his conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) but reduced his life sentence to 10 years. The Supreme Court acquitted him, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the victim was below 18 years old. While a school transfer certificate showed a 1997 birth date, Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act mandates using matriculation certificates or municipal birth certificates first; only ossification tests apply thereafter. The medical ossification test indicated the victim was 18-20 years old. The victim's voluntary statement to a magistrate—never impeached—established she consensually eloped and married the appellant. Medical evidence showed no assault. The Court thus set aside the conviction and acquitted the appellant.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Child Protection Juvenile Justice Age Determination Sexual Offences Evidence Medical Jurisprudence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login