Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-12 allowed

Pam Developments Private Ltd vs State of West Bengal

Bench: 2 — Vineet Saran

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that under the amended Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a court may grant stay of an arbitral award but must impose such conditions as it deems fit. The phrase 'having due regard to' the Code of Civil Procedure is directory, not mandatory. The Court rejected the Government's argument that Order XXVII Rule 8A of CPC requires automatic unconditional stay. The Arbitration Act mandates equal treatment of all parties (Section 18) with no special provisions for Government. Even if Rule 8A exempts from furnishing security, courts retain power to direct deposit of the awarded amount as a condition for stay. The unconditional stay granted by the High Court was set aside and the award restored for enforcement.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Enforcement of Awards Stay of Award Administrative Law Government Contracts Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login