Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-19 partly_allowed

Pappu and Ors vs Vinod Kumar Lamba and Anr

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar

In Brief

On 12 August 1995, a truck was struck by another negligently driven truck, killing the driver Om Prakash. His widow claimed compensation from both the truck owner and insurance company. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation against the owner but absolved the insurer, finding no proof that the vehicle was driven by a licensed person. The Supreme Court held that an insurance company's liability is not automatic; the owner must plead and prove the driver was authorised and properly licensed. However, the Court directed the insurer to pay the compensation to the claimants with liberty to recover the amount from the owner, upholding social welfare principles underlying compulsory motor insurance legislation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicle Insurance Third Party Liability Motor Accident Claims Insurance Defence Driving Licence Burden of Proof Social Welfare Legislation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login