Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-09 partly_allowed

PAPPU vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Bench: 3 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari, C.T. Ravikumar

In Brief

A 35-year-old man was convicted by the trial court and high court of raping and murdering a 7-year-old girl in a village in Uttar Pradesh in 2015, and sentenced to death. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction on the basis of circumstantial evidence: the child was last seen with him, he led police to the body, and forensic evidence supported rape. However, the Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with 30 years mandatory minimum, finding the trial and high courts failed to consider mitigating factors—the appellant's lack of criminal history, poverty, family dependence, and potential for reform. The Court reiterated that life imprisonment is the norm; death is imposed only in "rarest of rare" cases with proper weighing of all circumstances.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence — Circumstantial Evidence Murder Rape Sexual Offences Against Children Capital Punishment Sentencing Mitigation Criminal Procedure Protection of Children from Sexual Offences

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login