Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-11-29 dismissed

Patel Field Marshal Agencies and Anr vs P.M. Diesels Ltd. and Ors

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

P.M. Diesels Ltd. owned three registered trade marks featuring "Field Marshal" dating from 1964-1968. When Patel Field Marshal applied to register "Marshal" in 1982, P.M. Diesels sued for infringement. The defendants challenged the validity of P.M. Diesels' marks and separately filed rectification applications. The Supreme Court held that when an infringement suit is pending and invalidity is raised, the Civil Court must determine if prima facie tenability exists and frame an appropriate issue. If no rectification application is filed within the statutory timeframe, the right to invalidity is deemed abandoned and cannot be revived through separate rectification proceedings. Sections 46/56 and 107/111 of the Trade Marks Act operate in parallel but under different procedural regimes.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Intellectual Property Trade Marks Infringement Rectification of Register Statutory Procedure Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login