Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-03-31 partly_allowed

PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHI vs A. MAYILERUMPERUMAL & ORS

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, B. R. Gavai

In Brief

The Tamil Nadu Special Reservation Act 2021 sought to provide 10.5% internal reservation for Vanniakula Kshatriyas within the 20% reservation for Most Backward Classes and DE notified Communities. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment striking down the Act but on different grounds. While the Court held the State Legislature had competence to enact the law and that sub-classification of backward classes is permissible, it found the specific 10.5% reservation for Vanniakula Kshatriyas violated Articles 14, 15 and 16. The classification lacked substantial basis: it relied solely on population data from 1985 (antiquated), population alone cannot be the sole criterion for internal reservation, and no sound distinction was shown between Vanniakula Kshatriyas and the other 115 communities in the combined category.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Reservation Backward Classes Educational Institutions Public Employment Articles 15 and 16 Equal Protection Caste-Based Classification

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login