In Brief
Paul was convicted of murdering his wife under Indian Penal Code Section 300 and challenged the conviction. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that medical evidence of injuries to the neck and multiple contusions across the body conclusively established death by throttling. The Court rejected the appellant's claim of suicide as "completely false" and held that his statement under Section 313 Cr.PC, containing admissions of guilt, could support conviction when corroborated by evidence. The Court also found no merit in the drunkenness plea, noting the absence of evidence that it prevented formation of criminal intention. The appeal was dismissed.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.