Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-02-04 disposed

Pepsico (India) Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Grocery Markets & Shops Board & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Pepsico Holdings challenged a High Court judgment that directed it to approach the State Government under Section 5 of the Mathadi Act (which regulates manual workers' employment) rather than seek court relief. The Supreme Court upheld this approach, holding that Section 5 mandates Government decision-making on whether a welfare scheme applies to particular workers or employers. The Court gave Pepsico 12 weeks to refer all disputes to the Government and directed the Government to decide within three months thereafter, leaving all merits contentions open for the administrative process.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Administrative Law Social Welfare Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login