Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-02-01 partly_allowed

Phoenix Arc Private Limited vs ade Financial Services Limited & Ors

Bench: 3 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

Phoenix Arc challenged findings that Spade Financial Services and AAA Landmark were financial creditors of AKME Projects. The Supreme Court held that while the NCLAT correctly excluded them from the Committee of Creditors as related parties, the characterization as financial creditors was erroneous. The transactions were collusive, lacking genuine consideration for the time value of money. Although the entities later ceased being related parties, the exclusion applied because they were related parties when the alleged debt was created. The Court rejected a purely literal interpretation of \"is a related party,\" adopting purposive interpretation to prevent circumvention of statutory safeguards through commercial contrivances. Appeals were disposed of affirming the exclusion from CoC."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Financial Creditors Related Parties Committee of Creditors Collusive Transactions Fraudulent Conveyances Real Estate Regulation and Development Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login