Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-30 disposed

PRAGYA PRASUN & ORS vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Bench: 2 — J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

Acid attack survivors and a blind person challenged the digital KYC process used by banks, insurers, and telecom providers, arguing that requirements to blink eyes or capture selfies excluded them from opening accounts and accessing essential services, violating their constitutional rights and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The Supreme Court held that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses a constitutional duty to ensure digital infrastructure is universally accessible to all, including persons with disabilities. The Court directed the RBI and other regulators to mandate alternative KYC verification methods beyond eye-blinking, such as voice recognition and facial movements, and to ensure compliance with accessibility standards like WCAG. The Court emphasized that bridging the digital divide is now a constitutional imperative, not mere policy discretion, and that persons with disabilities must receive reasonable accommodations in all digital services.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Rights of Persons with Disabilities Digital KYC Accessibility Equality and Non-discrimination Financial Services Fundamental Rights Administrative Law Disability Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login