Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-01-12 allowed

Prakash Nayi @ Sen vs State of Goa

Bench: 2 — B. R. Gavai, M. M. Sundresh

In Brief

Prakash Nayi attacked a store worker with an iron plate and was convicted of murder by trial and high courts. On appeal, the Supreme Court acquitted him under Section 84 of the IPC (act of a person of unsound mind). The appellant had been hospitalized for schizophrenia before the incident and prescribed anti-psychotic medication. Although expert evidence was recorded years later, the court found credible evidence of prior treatment and noted the appellant later became fit to stand trial—itself indicating prior insanity. The courts below had wrongly focused on the heinous nature of the act while ignoring medical evidence and applying the wrong burden of proof. The Supreme Court held that legal insanity (not mere medical insanity) is the test, and proof must meet only a preponderance of probability standard. The appellant's full recovery and social integration further supported acquittal.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Insanity Defence Section 84 IPC Mental Health and Criminal Responsibility Evidence Burden of Proof Appellate Criminal Procedure Psychiatric Evidence Schizophrenia

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login