Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Sunday, 08 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-11-07 dismissed

Pramod Jain and Others vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

An acquirer (Pramod Jain and others) made a hostile public offer in November 2009 to acquire 25% of Golden Tobacco Limited. After 21 months, citing deterioration in the target company's financial position and alleged asset encumbrance, the acquirer sought to withdraw the offer. SEBI and the Securities Appellate Tribunal rejected the request. The Supreme Court upheld this, holding that under SEBI's Takeover Regulations, a public offer cannot be withdrawn except where performance becomes impossible. Mere financial loss or asset deterioration, even if caused by the target company, does not justify withdrawal. Acquirers must exercise due diligence before announcing an offer and are bound by their announcement to protect minority shareholders' interests.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securities Regulation Takeover Code Merger and Acquisition Hostile Takeover Public Offer Administrative Law Constitutional Law Minority Shareholders Protection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login