Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-09 dismissed

Pramod Laxman Gudadhe vs Election Commission of India and Ors

Bench: 3 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

A voter challenged the High Court's decision dismissing a public interest petition against holding a bye-election in the Bhandara–Gondiya Lok Sabha constituency following an MP's resignation in December 2017. The petitioner argued that if elections were held in May 2018, the new representative would serve less than one year (until March 2019), making it wasteful. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court, holding that Section 151A of the Representation of the People Act permits bye-elections where the remainder of the term exceeds one year. Since the next General Election was scheduled for June 2019, the remainder exceeded one year. The Court ruled that financial burden and limited tenure are not valid grounds to prevent elections; Parliament's intent is to ensure constituencies remain represented.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electoral Law Representation of the People Act Bye-Elections Constitutional Law Public Interest Litigation Constitutional Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login