Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-11-07

Preetha Krishnan & Ors vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Karol, Prashant Kumar Mishra

In Brief

A 51-year-old Assistant Engineer employed by the Public Works Department died in a road accident in 2012, leaving a wife and children. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs. 44,04,912 in compensation. The High Court reduced this to Rs. 35,10,144 by applying a split multiplier, accounting for reduced income after the deceased's projected retirement. The Supreme Court held that split multipliers cannot be routinely applied and retirement is not an exceptional circumstance justifying their use. The Court restored compensation at Rs. 47,76,794 using the standard Sarla Verma method based on the deceased's age and income at death, emphasizing uniformity in compensation calculation across all courts.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Compensation Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Multiplier Death Claim Dependents Tortious Liability Judicial Uniformity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login