Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-17 allowed

Prem Jeevan vs K.S. Venkata Raman and Another

Bench: 2 — Judge 1, Judge 2

In Brief

The Court held that where a decree for specific performance of a property sale requires the buyer to deposit the balance consideration within a specified period, failure to make such deposit without obtaining an extension of time from the court renders the decree unexecutable. The mere fact that the seller did not seek rescission of the contract under the Specific Relief Act does not automatically extend the period or permit execution. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court's reversal, and restored the Executing Court's order rejecting execution. The decree-holders were entitled only to withdraw their deposited amount.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Specific Performance Decree Execution Contract Rescission

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login