Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-09-02 allowed

Prem Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Work-charged employees of Uttar Pradesh challenged the exclusion of their work-charged service from qualifying service for pension under Rule 3(8) of the U.P. Retirement Benefits Rules, 1961. The Supreme Court held that excluding work-charged service periods violates the constitutional guarantee of equality. The Court ruled that work-charged service must be counted towards pension eligibility. Arrears of pension are limited to three years before the order date. Employees cannot claim retrospective wage differences for periods prior to superannuation age. The Court allowed all employee appeals and dismissed State appeals, directing admissible benefits be paid within three months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Pension Benefits Public Employees Equality Rights Retirement Benefits

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login