Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-25

Public Interest Foundation & Ors vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 5 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed whether the judiciary can impose disqualifications for elected office beyond those explicitly provided in the Constitution and Representation of the People Act, 1951. The petitioners sought to bar candidates with criminal charges from contesting elections to check criminalization of politics. The Court held that disqualifications can only be added by Parliament under Article 102(1)(e) and 191(1)(e); the judiciary cannot legislate or do indirectly what the Constitution forbids directly. However, recognizing the serious threat of criminal infiltration into politics, the Court issued directions requiring candidates to disclose criminal antecedents and recommended Parliament enact stronger legislation to prevent persons facing serious criminal charges from entering politics.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Electoral Law Separation of Powers Disqualifications for Office Criminalization of Politics Judicial Review Fundamental Rights Rule of Law Democratic Principles

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login