Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-09 allowed

Purohit and Company vs Khatoonbee and Anr

Bench: 3 — Jagdish Singh Khehar

In Brief

A motor accident claimed 28 years after it occurred was rejected as a dead claim, not a surviving claim. Although the Motor Vehicles Act no longer prescribes a statutory limitation period for filing compensation claims after the 1994 amendment, the Supreme Court held that claimants must still approach the tribunal within a reasonable time. Drawing analogies from consumer and industrial law, the Court ruled that extreme delays—without adequate justification—are inherently unreasonable. Poverty and ignorance of law were insufficient grounds to excuse a 28-year delay. The appeal was allowed, but the deposited litigation fee was transmitted to the respondents.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Compensation Limitation Procedure Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login