Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-14 allowed

Rahul Dutta & Ors vs State of Bihar & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This case challenged Rule 5A(3) of the Bihar Civil Service (Judicial Branch) (Recruitment) Rules, 1955, which limited final examination candidates to 10% of those who appeared in the preliminary test. The Supreme Court struck down this rule as arbitrary and violating the mandatory 1:10 ratio (vacancies to successful candidates) established in Malik Mazhar Sultan. The rule failed to prescribe minimum passing marks and unreasonably restricted the competitive field, particularly disadvantaging reserved category candidates. The Court directed that candidates equal to 10 times the available vacancies be called for the final examination within six weeks and confirmed horizontal reservation for women candidates would be provided.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Service Recruitment Judicial Appointments Constitutional Law Reservation Administrative Law Public Service Commission

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login