Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-03-13 partly_allowed

Raj Bahadur Singh vs State of Uttarakhand

Bench: 2 — Pankaj Mithal, Prasanna B. Varale

In Brief

Raj Bahadur Singh, an Excise Department constable, was convicted of demanding and accepting a ₹500 bribe from Kashmir Singh, engaged in illicit liquor manufacture, by threatening legal action. After Singh lodged a complaint, police organized a trap where Singh handed over marked currency notes. When Singh accepted them on 19 June 1990, phenolphthalein powder on his hands turned pink, confirming the bribe. The Trial Court and High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, finding credible witness testimony and corroborating trap evidence. Minor inconsistencies in witness statements did not undermine the prosecution case. Considering Singh's advanced age and custody period, the Court reduced his sentence to six months' rigorous imprisonment under Section 7 and one year under Section 13(2).

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Corruption Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Bribery Criminal Evidence Trap Proceedings Witness Credibility Sentencing Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login