Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-12-13 partly_allowed

RAJA CHANDRASEKHARAN vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 3 — N. V. Ramana, Surya Kant, Hima Kohli

In Brief

In this bail matter under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Supreme Court found that the High Court erred in cancelling bail granted to Bharat Chaudhary and rejecting bail for Raja Chandrasekharan. The Court held that without quantitative analysis in test reports and without contraband recovered from the accused's premises, the prosecution could not establish commercial quantity—a prerequisite for bail denial. The Court also ruled that confessional statements under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, held inadmissible in Tofan Singh, cannot form the sole basis for establishing nexus between accused. The bail granted by the trial court was restored for A-4, and A-1 was ordered released on bail given his prolonged custody.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Bail Criminal Procedure Evidence Confessional Statements Admissibility Quantitative Analysis Commercial Quantity Seizure and Search Procedural Safeguards

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login