Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-05-17 dismissed

RAJESH KUMAR vs ANAND KUMAR & ORS

Bench: 2 — Pankaj Mithal, Prashant Kumar Mishra

In Brief

Rajesh Kumar sought specific performance to compel the execution of a sale deed for agricultural land, having paid earnest money and agreed terms with a Power of Attorney Holder of multiple co-owners. However, one of the co-owners (as Holder) sold the land to third parties instead. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that: (1) an agreement signed by only one co-owner without all co-owners' signatures or a proven Power of Attorney cannot bind all co-owners for specific performance; (2) the plaintiff must personally appear as a witness to prove his readiness and willingness—evidence from his Power of Attorney Holder is insufficient; and (3) filing the suit on the last day of limitation, after long awareness of the breach and interim steps taken, bars relief despite statutory limitation not expiring.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Specific Performance Contract Law Evidence Power of Attorney Property Law Limitation Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login