Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-16 allowed

Rakesh Kumar Paul vs State of Assam

Bench: 3 — Madan B. Lokur, Prafulla C. Pant, Deepak Gupta

In Brief

This case concerns the right to "default bail" under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. A former chairman of the Assam Public Service Commission was arrested in a corruption case involving charges carrying sentences up to 10 years. The core issue was whether he was entitled to bail after 60 days or only after 90 days of detention without a charge sheet. The Court held that "imprisonment for a term not less than ten years" means a *minimum* of 10 years, so offences with maximum 10 years but lower minimum require bail after 60 days. The Court also ruled that the indefeasible right to default bail is not lost even if no formal written application was made, and cannot be defeated by filing a charge sheet after the accused has offered to furnish bail. The plea was allowed, emphasizing that personal liberty must not be compromised for perceived justice.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail Personal Liberty Prevention of Corruption Act Default Bail Article 21

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login