Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-12-10 dismissed

Ram Murti Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This appeal challenges the compulsory retirement of a judicial officer under U.P. Fundamental Rules Rule 56(C). The Supreme Court held that judges must maintain the highest standards of integrity to preserve public confidence in the judiciary. While inadvertent errors may warrant counselling, conduct creating a perception of impropriety cannot be tolerated. The court applied a strict standard of judicial conduct, noting that such high expectations are essential because ordinary litigants must have complete faith in the justice system. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the retirement order.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Judicial Conduct Administrative Law Compulsory Retirement Judicial Officer Discipline Judicial Integrity Public Confidence in Judiciary

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login