Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-06 allowed

Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Nath Sahu since deceased Thr. L.Rs. & Ors vs Goberdhan Sao since deceased Thr. Lrs. & Ors

Bench: 1 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

This case concerns the partition of joint family property and the determination of respective shares following multiple deaths. Fuchan Mahto (died 1940) left a widow Puniya Devi and son Mithu Sao. After Mithu Sao's death in 1961, a notional partition under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, recognized eight sharers including his widow and mother. The Supreme Court held that the appellants (children of Mithu Sao's first wife) were entitled to 38.1% of the joint family property, not the 37.5% awarded by the lower courts, based on principles of Hindu succession law and women's inheritance rights."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Hindu Law Partition Joint Family Property Succession Women's Rights to Property

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login