Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-01-27 partly_allowed

RAMESH BAGHEL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & OTHERS

Bench: 2 — B.V. Nagarathna, Satish Chandra Sharma

In Brief

A Christian man sought the Supreme Court's permission to bury his deceased pastor father in the village graveyard at Chhindwada, where his ancestors and relatives had been buried for decades. The State opposed this, citing lack of a formally designated Christian burial ground in the village and directing burial at a designated site in distant Karkapal village. The Court was divided. One judge would have allowed burial in the appellant's private land with State protection; the other upheld the Karkapal burial ground. Exercising powers under Article 142 to resolve the impasse, the unified order directed burial at Karkapal with full logistical support and police protection, emphasizing the State's duty to designate Christian burial sites throughout the State within two months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Fundamental Rights Constitutional Law Religious Freedom Right to Dignity Burial Rights Article 21 Article 25 Minority Rights Secular Constitution Public Order Administrative Law Gram Panchayat Christian Community Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login