Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-03-27 allowed

Ramesh Kumaran & Anr vs State

Bench: 2 — Abhay S Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan

In Brief

Two lawyers in Kodaikanal filed cross FIRs against each other arising from a 2017 incident involving alleged assault and abusive language. Both cases alleged identical offences under the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court encouraged settlement and, after the second respondent (defendant in the second FIR) tendered unconditional apology and undertook cordial conduct, exercised power under Article 142 to quash both FIRs. The first appellant's initial threat to commit suicide if the second FIR were quashed was treated as contemptuous conduct, but given his subsequent apology and repentance, the Court chose magnanimity. The order aimed to resolve years-long professional animosity and allow both lawyers to contribute meaningfully to the legal system.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Professional Ethics Bar Conduct Article 142 Settlement and Compromise Abuse of Process

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login