Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-07 dismissed

Rameshwar Prasad Shrivastava and Ors vs Dwarkadhis Projects Pvt. Ltd. and Ors

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

Apartment buyers in a Haryana housing project filed a group consumer complaint against the builder for delayed possession and various other grievances. The National Commission dismissed the complaint as not maintainable because it was filed on behalf of only some (not all) affected buyers without formal permission under the Consumer Protection Act's class action rules. The Supreme Court upheld this dismissal, holding that Section 12(1)(c) of the Act requires complaints representing multiple consumers to cover all consumers with the same grievance, not merely a subset, and must comply with procedural requirements under the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court permitted the buyers to re-approach the State Commission with the evidence already gathered.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Class Action Civil Procedure Real Estate

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login