Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-28 partly_allowed

Rasiklal Kantilal & Co vs Board of Trustee of Port of Bombay & Others

Bench: 2 — Chelameswar

In Brief

A buyer of imported goods that were shipped on a cash-against-documents basis and left unclaimed at Bombay Port sought remission of demurrage charges. The Port Trust had levied Rs. 2.8 crores in demurrage but granted only partial remission. The Supreme Court held that regardless of when title passed to the buyer, the Port Trust can recover demurrage from any person claiming delivery as a sub-bailee. However, the Court emphasized that the Port Trust's discretion to grant or refuse remission must be exercised rationally and based on a clear policy, not arbitrarily. The judgment was set aside, allowing the Port Trust to reconsider the remission application while recording reasoned grounds.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Port Authorities Statutory Discretion Maritime Law Bailment Demurrage Charges Remedies Against Port Trust

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login