Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-07-31 allowed

Ravinder Kaur Grewal & Ors vs Manjit Kaur & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

Brothers Harbans Singh (deceased), Mohan Singh, and Sohan Singh purchased disputed land in 1970. A family settlement was orally agreed in 1970, allocating ownership to Harbans Singh, though the property remained in the names of the other brothers in revenue records. The settlement was memorialized in writing (Exhibit P-6) on 10 March 1988. Harbans Singh constructed 16 shops, a service station, and boundary wall on the property and remained in possession. After his death, his legal heirs sued for a declaration of ownership. The trial court partly decreed the suit. The first appellate court allowed the appeal and declared them full owners. The High Court reversed, holding that Exhibit P-6 required registration as it transferred immovable property rights. The Supreme Court upheld the first appellate court's decision, holding that Exhibit P-6 was merely a memorandum of an already-settled family arrangement, not a document creating rights for the first time, and therefore did not require registration. The defendants were estopped from resiling from the settlement after benefiting from it.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Family Settlement Registration Act Immovable Property Estoppel Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Property Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login