Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-25 disposed

Bench: 3 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

This petition, initiated on a former Chief Justice's concerns, challenges the State's governance of prisons addressing overcrowding, unnatural deaths, inadequate and untrained staff. The Court affirmed that public interest litigation concerning prisoner rights is a valid constitutional exercise under Article 21, despite claims of judicial activism. Finding that earlier reform efforts had not achieved finality, the Court constituted a Supreme Court Committee on Prison Reforms headed by former Justice Amitava Roy to review implementation of various prison guidelines, assess staff adequacy and training, examine violence and medical facilities, and recommend comprehensive reforms in prison administration across Indian states and union territories.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Public Interest Litigation Prisoners' Rights Prison Administration Judicial Activism Article 21 Separation of Powers Administrative Law Social Justice Committee Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login