Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-02-17 allowed

Regional Transport Authority & Anr vs Shaju etc

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

In Brief

A stage carriage permit holder applied to replace his 2016-model bus with a 2006-model bus. The Regional Transport Authority rejected the application under Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicles Rules, which permits rejection if the replacement vehicle is older. The High Court held the rule ultra vires Section 83 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which allows replacement with 'any other vehicle of the same nature.' The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that Rule 174(2)(c) is valid and intra vires the Act. The Court reasoned that the rule falls within the State Government's jurisdiction over permit regulation (Chapter V) and does not encroach on Central Government's powers over vehicle fitness and age limits (Chapter IV). The discretion to reject must be exercised reasonably and fairly."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Act Constitutional Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Regulatory Powers Subordinate Legislation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login