Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-01-03 allowed

& ANR vs JAYA WADHWANI

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

This case concerns when an insurance policy becomes effective. Two consumers claimed death benefits for suicides occurring within 12 months, arguing the policy began when they submitted their proposal or paid a deposit receipt. The insurance company claimed the 12-month suicide exclusion period ran from the policy issuance date. The Supreme Court held that the policy issuance date—not the proposal date or deposit receipt date—marks the policy's commencement. Mere cheque tender is insufficient; the cheque must be encashed. For reinstated policies, the reinstatement date is the relevant commencement date. Strict adherence to policy terms is required. Both claims were rejected, and the appeals were allowed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insurance Law Life Insurance Consumer Protection Contract Interpretation Suicide Clause Policy Commencement Policy Reinstatement

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login