Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-03 allowed

Roshina T vs Abdul Azeez K.T. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court order that had allowed a writ petition seeking restoration of possession of a flat. The Court held that disputes about property possession between private individuals are not maintainable under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction) when civil remedies such as ordinary suits are available. The High Court had impermissibly entertained the petition and recorded factual findings on ownership and possession, essentially converting the writ petition into a civil suit. The Court directed that such disputes must be adjudicated in a properly constituted civil court, and granted liberty to the parties to pursue civil proceedings for their claims.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Writ Jurisdiction Property Rights Remedies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login