Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-04-29 partly_allowed

S.D. JAYAPRAKASH AND ORS. ETC vs THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Joymalya Bagchi

In Brief

Data Entry Operators appointed on a contractual basis between 1996–1999 were later regularised in 2015. They sought to count their contractual service period towards pension and other benefits under the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. The High Court refused, holding that contractual service cannot be counted because the initial appointment was not pursuant to Staff Selection Commission recommendation. The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, directing that Rule 17 of the Pension Rules applies upon regularisation. The Court mandated that the Government provide a structured mechanism for employees to exercise the statutory option to refund benefits in exchange for counting prior contractual service towards pension, with clear communication of amounts and defined timelines.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Service Benefits Pension Rules Contractual Employment Regularisation Public Service

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login