In Brief
In this civil appeal concerning a partition suit initiated in 1985, the Supreme Court examined the concurrent findings made by three courts below—the trial court, the appellate court, and the High Court. The Court found no reason to interfere with the unanimous factual conclusions reached by all lower courts. Since concurrent findings of fact are not ordinarily subject to interference on appeal absent perversity or misreading of evidence, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower courts' decisions in the partition matter.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.