Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-02-09 disposed

Sampurna Behura vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

Sampurna Behura filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking implementation of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 (later 2015). The Supreme Court found that State Governments had failed to adequately implement the law despite over a decade of enactment, resulting in poor conditions in child care institutions, lack of trained personnel, non-functional statutory bodies, and deprivation of children's fundamental rights. The Court issued 16 comprehensive directions requiring States to strengthen institutional infrastructure, fill vacancies in Juvenile Justice Boards and Child Welfare Committees, establish Special Juvenile Police Units, provide mandatory training to all stakeholders, maintain minimum standards in child care institutions, appoint qualified probation officers, utilize technology for data collection, and create monitoring mechanisms. The Court emphasized that child protection is a constitutional obligation, not discretionary, and appointed high courts to oversee implementation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Children's Rights Constitutional Law Public Interest Litigation Judicial Activism Child Welfare Administrative Law Human Rights Child Protection Institutional Reform

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login