Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-07-28 allowed

SANDEEP KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

Bench: 2 — C.T. Ravikumar, Sudhanshu Dhulia

In Brief

A trial court had power under Criminal Procedure Code Section 319 to summon three persons as accused during trial based on eyewitness testimony, even though police had not charged them initially. The Supreme Court held that at the summoning stage, the court need only satisfy itself prima facie that evidence suggests the person committed a triable offence—without judging the evidence's merits. The High Court erred by reviewing evidence prematurely and making factual findings. For unlawful assembly charges, mere presence in the group suffices; no individual role is required. Trial should proceed afresh against the newly summoned accused.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Unlawful Assembly Evidence Powers of Court

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login