Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-01-03 dismissed

SATISH P. BHATT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR

Bench: 2 — Vikram Nath, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

Two directors of a company were convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to 10 months imprisonment with a total compensation liability of Rs. 5 crores. After appeals were dismissed, they sought bail and suspension of sentence by offering to settle for Rs. 4.63 crores. The High Court granted interim protection but later cancelled it when they failed to pay the agreed amount by the stipulated date. The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation, holding that the inter se settlement between the two convicts regarding payment apportionment did not bind the complainant. Since the total agreed amount was not paid, the automatic withdrawal clause in the High Court's order applied, and bail and suspension of sentence were properly cancelled.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Criminal Procedure Contempt of Court Non-bailable Offences Bail Cancellation Undertakings before Court Settlement Agreements Conviction and Sentence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login