Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-05 remanded

Securities and Exchange Board of India vs Anandkumar Baldevbhai Patel

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

SEBI investigated alleged insider trading involving three persons: Kanaiyalal Baldevbhai Patel, Dipak Patel, and Anandkumar Baldevbhai Patel. SEBI alleged they violated FUTP regulations through coordinated trading. The Adjudication Officer imposed penalties of Rs. 5 crore each on the first two and Rs. 1 crore on Anandkumar. The Securities Appellate Tribunal upheld these penalties but failed to record independent findings regarding Anandkumar's specific role. The Supreme Court held that the Appellate Tribunal must independently analyze each respondent's conduct, not merely adopt the Adjudication Officer's conclusions. The Court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the case for fresh consideration with independent findings.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securities Regulation Insider Trading Market Integrity Appellate Jurisdiction Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login