Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-10-30 partly_allowed

Sedco Forex International Inc vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Meerut & Anr

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

Non-resident contractors engaged in mineral oil exploration in India received mobilisation fees for transporting drilling rigs from foreign locations to Indian offshore sites. The Supreme Court held that these fixed mobilisation fees must be included in gross receipts under Section 44BB(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on which 10% is charged as presumptive income. Though Section 44BB is a special computation provision, it operates within the framework of the Act's charging sections (Sections 4, 5, 9). The Court clarified that amounts specified in Section 44BB(2) are deemed income for tax purposes. However, compensation for actual loss of the operator's tools (not relating to services or plant supply) falls outside Section 44BB and is not taxable. The assessees' appeals (except the Revenue's appeal on the tools-loss issue) were dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Mineral Oil Exploration Non-resident Taxation Business Income Presumptive Income Sectional Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login