In Brief
This case involved an appeal against a High Court order granting bail to respondent No. 2, who was charged with murdering his wife and staging a fatal car accident to conceal the crime. The prosecution relied on expert reports (AIIMS, CRRI, CFSL, IIT) suggesting strangulation followed by a staged accident, while the accused claimed it was an accidental death. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the High Court properly exercised its discretion in granting bail. The Court found the High Court had considered relevant factors: expert reports based on photographs were not conclusive and must be tested at trial; the nine-day FIR delay and family members' absence of suspicion at post-mortem supported bail; and the documentary nature of evidence reduced tampering risks. The serious charge alone could not override these circumstances, particularly given the presumption of innocence and the principle that bail is the general rule.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.