Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-27 allowed

Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs State rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police

Bench: 2 — Pinaki Chandra Ghose

In Brief

Six men were convicted of murdering Rajagopalan, President of Hindu Munnani Association, in Madurai on 10 October 1994, under conspiracy and TADA provisions. The Supreme Court quashed all convictions and sentences, finding that the sanction for prosecuting under TADA was invalid. The sanctioning authorities mechanically approved the TADA charges without applying their minds to critical evidence and without establishing that the murder was intended to strike terror in the public mind—an essential element under TADA Section 3(1). The Court held that a single murder, however violent, does not constitute terrorism without the specific intent to terrorize. The confessions were also involuntary. Non-compliance with the mandatory prior approval requirement vitiated the entire proceedings.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Terrorism Law Conspiracy Murder TADA (Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act) Sanction and Approval Confessions Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login