Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-21 allowed

Sejal Glass Ltd vs Navilan Merchants Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that a plaint cannot be partially rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Where a plaint discloses a cause of action against any defendant, the suit must proceed to trial against that defendant. The trial court erred in bifurcating the suit and striking out the pleadings against certain directors while allowing it to continue against the company. The Court set aside the judgment and granted the defendants eight weeks to file their written statement, after which the suit would proceed to trial.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Pleadings Order VII Rule 11 Plaint Demurrer

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login