Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-08-13 dismissed

SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL vs ISMAT AHMED AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

A tenant challenged a court order rejecting his late application for rent deposit under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, seventeen days after the thirty-day statutory deadline. He sought condonation of delay under the Limitation Act, 1963. The Supreme Court held that the time limits in Section 7 of the WBPT Act are strictly mandatory and cannot be extended via the Limitation Act. Deposit of rent and filing of applications must occur within thirty days of summons service; failure results in striking out of the tenant's defence against eviction. The proviso allowing extension applies only post-determination of rent, not the initial deposit period. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that tenant protections depend on mandatory, timely compliance.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Landlord and Tenant Law Tenancy Act Limitation Law Eviction Proceedings Rent Deposit Statutory Interpretation Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login