Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-04-09 allowed

SHAILNDRA KUMAR JAIN vs MAYA PRAKASH JAIN

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra

In Brief

A daughter of deceased parents sought to be impleaded as a defendant in a suit involving partition of joint family property. The trial court and High Court rejected her application, citing an earlier 1966 partition decree between her parents and brothers. The Supreme Court held that upon intestate death of parents, daughters are Class I heirs entitled to share in parental property under the Hindu Succession Act, regardless of earlier partition decrees. Therefore, daughters are necessary and proper parties to any suit involving division of parental property. The appeal was allowed and the daughter's impleadment application was permitted.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Succession Law Family Law Civil Procedure Hindu Succession Act Necessary Parties Partition

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login